Alternative Assignment Partisan media is bad for democracy because citizens are given information that is bias or slanted toward a particular political ideology. This limits their ability to think critically about which public policies and elected officials they want to support. There has been a big agreement that most news outlets are politically biased. Even President Trump says and tweets this everyday calling them fake news and alternative facts and so, does some civilians. There have been studies on whether these news outlets are really biased and these studies have confirmed that most of these media outlets are biased. But the question that still stands is are these biased partisan providers really harmful to democracy? Most people claim that exclusion of biases partisan channels like the newspaper, television, and radio stations limits the amount of information that is accessible to civilians. Information is key to civilians so they can hold elected officials responsible, according to The Death and Life of American Journalism,” for in an exact sense the present crisis of western democracy is a crisis of journalism” this basically means that the essence of journalism, and the way it is produced poses a huge political issue. In a time when political divisions and different beliefs and opinions are most times not in sync with other voters, this is usually a terrible problem. According to The Economist ” The median voter has never been so bored”. Most voters cannot be bothered and usually find partisan politics boring. Often times, the regularly communicated standpoints that are biased media are usually distinctively bad for democracy and needs to be clarified. Changing the media surroundings doesn’t just change the information accessible to voters it also alters government officials’ behaviors. This may involve an exchange off between better assortment with unbiased media and better control with biased media. In a polarized political environment this exchanged off is settled for biased media having the advantage influence by the policy changes that dominates the misplacement related with increased political slip-ups. As a guideline, first think about results with an unprejudiced media outlet. Since the outlet shares the voter’s inclinations, it needs to increase the probability that a direct incumbent is reelected and an extraordinary officeholder replaced. To do as such, the media outlet honestly uncovers all its data. The voter is educated about the incumbent’s type and impeccably screens legislators at the time of the election. Since the outlet’s article uncovers his type, an officeholder’s activity has no effect on his reelection chances. A direct conservative incumbent at that point dependably executes his favored approach which may contrast from the voter’s. Fair-minded outlets are along these lines related with great determination, yet lost control. The promise is usually to demonstrate media utilization together with voting, to independently quantify tastes for similar news and the impact of slanted media utilization on voters’ belief system. The impact likewise interfaces with the presence of tastes for similarly invested news. consumers for whom the two impacts are convenient to can organize into a criticism group in which they expend bias media, their philosophies at that point develop toward the bias, their desire for that bias media increase. To make an electoral choice, the voter can utilize two particular pieces of data. To begin with, the incumbents’ decision which may uncover data about their type. Secondly, a news report from one or two media outlets relying upon the media condition. This report contains both a publication which appears as falsifiable data about the officeholder political belief system direct or extraordinary and potentially a news story which appears as certain data about the nature of the incumbents’ choice. Outlets would thus be able to participate in presentation bias with articles lying about type and exclusion bias with news story concealing data. In summation, Partisan media is bad for democracy because of the impacts the media twist the composition of self-choice into the utilization of slanted media to investigate media-driven polarization and to counterfactually mimic alternative ideological slant systems by the linked news outlets.